Talent Zoo

Awesome Jobs, Great Companies, & Hot Talent
menu button
Bookmark and Share
October 25, 2005
The French Evolution
 
This week, the advertising industry had a public relations problem.

Neil French's resignation from WPP became a news story that was picked up by newspapers worldwide. Hell, I even saw it covered on Fox News. The singular face of the ad industry was a middle-aged white guy puffing on a stogie.

Reading the press' descriptions of Neil French was quite entertaining.

"Guru." "Legend." "Celebrated Figure." "Expert." (The UK Sun used the phrase "Motormouth Brummie." I'm not sure if that's good or bad. I have no clue what it means.)

Frankly, Neil French isn't the problem. The problem lies with the starstruck suckers who treat his every utterance like it was the word of Moses or the Dalai Lama. And then insist his comments are above reproach simply because, well, he’s Neil French and we're not.

The cult of personality that surrounds certain people in advertising is silly at the very least, and in the case of Neil French, dangerous. It was bad for business at WPP where he worked, and it's bad for the ad business as a whole.

I'm always amazed at the aura that surrounds the people who have the ability to match some decent words with a picture or two and a product shot and then convince a client to say "yes." In an award show book, they're perfect. Genius. Untouchable.

Then, inevitably, they open their mouths. They get quoted in Adweek or give an interview in Creativity. Rarely is there any real brilliance in anything they utter. Which makes me think, "that person's full of shit." Or more appropriately, "that person's just as full of shit as I am and why did he end up in Creativity?"

I have a friend who's met many of these people, whereas I haven't. Usually when I inquire as to what these "superstars" are like, the report goes something like this: "He's unimpressive." "She's really not that bright." "You'd be disappointed."

And yeah, I am disappointed quite a bit when I hear that. Because, starting in ad school, we looked to certain people and certain agencies whose work we admired like: They have the secrets. They know something we don't. We have to be just like them. But it was beyond admiration. It was hero worship.

I've now been in advertising long enough to see many of the agencies we admired go out of business. To see the particular people we admired end up doing incredibly average work or leaving the business altogether.

With very few exceptions, the people in advertising that impress me are not the ones with the most trophies. They're the quieter ones. The ones who use their talents boosting their clients' businesses, not boosting their egos.

So let's keep things in perspective. Neil French will keep pontificating on "crap" females and sucking on his big brown cigars. Just maybe not on WPP's dime.

The rest of us have jobs to do, bills to pay, and clients to serve. And we face a consumer public where women—at least in America, according to American Demographics magazine—control 85% of the household spending. That's $3.5 trillion. Oh yeah, and a lot of them try to balance career and family just like female creative directors do.

Here's hoping advertising's next expert legendary guru understands the audience our industry needs to be communicating with. I’ll save my hero worship for him.

Or better yet, her.


Bookmark and Share
blog comments powered by Disqus

Since 2002, Dan Goldgeier has been writing the most provocative advertising columns about advertising and marketing -- over 170 of them, covering every related topic you can think of. Now based in Seattle, Dan is a copywriter and ad school graduate who's worked at shops big and small. 


Visit his copywriting websitesee his LinkedIn profile or follow him on Twitter.

And please, buy his book for 99 cents.

 

TalentZoo.com Advertising