TalentZoo.com |  Beyond Madison Avenue |  Flack Me |  Beneath the Brand Archives  |  Categories
California Agencies Face Changes With Freelance Law
By: Digiday
Bookmark and Share Subscribe to the Digital Pivot RSS Feed Share

Agencies have long relied on freelancers to fill their ranks, but that is about to get tougher in California.

The California Supreme Court ruled in April that a worker can only be hired as an independent contractor if they perform a job that is not part of a business’ “usual course.” For instance, an agency could employ a video producer on a freelance basis if it doesn’t have an in-house video team. If, however, an agency already has a video team, that additional person would have to be hired as an employee and granted all of the benefits that come with it.

Freelancers are a regular facet of agency life, offering the workers freedom to take on projects as they wish and employers needed flexibility to manage costs and boost utilization, not to mention skirt paying benefits. Changing the status of freelancers could hit agencies hard.

“For a company that is playing the margin game, they’re going to hurt from this because it’s going to be a massive investment,” said one agency executive, requesting anonymity. “There will be massive layoffs,” said another executive, speaking on the condition of anonymity.

While the cost of onboarding more employees is still a burden, most smaller, independent agencies are more worried about losing talented freelancers that would rather maintain their independence. That’s why some agencies are actively working on finding a middle ground — a solution that won’t push freelancers away, but still adhere to the law. Three of the five executives Digiday spoke to for this story are in the process of meeting with their freelancers to discuss next steps forward.

“Our fear is not whether the company can afford to comply with the law — we’re fully able to do that. The fear is that employees will reject what the state is requiring and will make it difficult for us to recruit,” said one executive at a small, independent agency, requesting anonymity.

The agency employs 17 freelancers, nearly double the agency’s 10 full-time employees. That not just to the benefit of the business, the agency owner said.

“There’s a large sector of our industry that doesn’t want to work in-house permanently,” he said. “They love the freedom to be able to do it on their own, whether that is working on several jobs simultaneously or having the ability to travel or work remotely. That’s why in the short term, an agency that does not adhere to the law will have an advantage over those that do.”

Indeed, the life of an agency freelancer can be pretty good.

“I like having the freedom to work for whoever I want, whenever I want,” said a freelancer who is on the fence about transitioning into a traditional employee role.

For some agencies, that means laying out the true cost of full-time employment. After all, the cost of employees is not just salary.


READ MORE 

 



Bookmark and Share Subscribe to the Digital Pivot RSS Feed Share
About the Author
This article was published on Digiday.com.  A full link to the original piece is after the story. www.digiday.com
Digital Pivot on

Advertise on Digital Pivot
Return to Top