TALENTZOO.COM ARCHIVES  |  CATEGORIES  |  CONTACT US  |  SEARCH:  

Bookmark and Share   Subscribe to the Beneath the Brand RSS Feed July 30, 2010
Marketing 101: Practice What You Brand
HOT or NOT
The NFL's Return
     

OTHER SITES IN OUR BLOG NETWORK
Digital Pivot
Beyond Madison Avenue
Flack Me
 

I worked for a major university at a time when they were revising their brand. They had a huge campaign to indoctrinate the employees: webinars, workshops, posters, flyers, and e-mail teasers. Overall, it required compliance training on the new image the university wished to portray. It was a comprehensive campaign and emphasized how the university's employees were friendly, caring, and it was a happy place to work.

Unfortunately, the brand and reality did not match. My division, which consisted of about 500 people, took the branding attempt as a joke and proceeded as normal. Why? Because the university treated their people in enrollment like telemarketers: minimum telephone outbound dials, minimum client talk time, assigned breaks, periods of nothing but outbound dials regardless of student appointments, and so on.

It was, in all aspects, a boiler room with high turnover and low moral. It left a feeling there was no time to talk to students in a relaxed manner; that would decrease dials. It was, basically, the type of sales job where the boss is focused only on numbers.

How does that affect branding?

Simply, if a company spends thousands of dollars creating an external image and does nothing about how the employees see the company internally, a sizable portion of that branding investment is wasted. The attitudes projected by a company’s image toward the public must match the company's culture on all levels. If it is not simpatico, the customer will see a disconnect between its perception of the company and reality. This leads to distrust, lost sales, and wasted efforts.

Branding is not just a marketing tool. Again, it must be part of the company culture, or it loses much of its effectiveness.

At the university, lack of employee moral was a constant concern for HR. In my two-and-a-half years there, I became aware of at least four HR investigations into employee treatment. Nothing changed on the floor, except the company launched a rebranding campaign that projected the university as a friendly place.

If employees do not feel they are treated well, the customers will know. Besides, if 7,000 employees tell 10 friends the job is awful, and they, in turn, tell five friends -- well, that is a lot of negative PR the branding needs to overcome.

Of course, the solution for the university comes right out of their MBA program (and probably their undergraduate classes as well): Practice what you teach.

In the case of a business, practice what you brand. If it isn't real, people can tell.
 


Bookmark and Share   Subscribe to the Beneath the Brand RSS Feed
What do you think? Post a comment below!

Comments
Add Your Comments
ROInnis85 (Nationwide, USA) on 03 Aug 2010 at 12:24 pm

Wow I cannot agree with you more.

I used to work at a gym, and they are always making new rules, trying to rebrand its image each month. It was tough for me b/c in sales you have to hit your numbers or you don't eat. It was tough to try and assimilate with what they wanted me to do, when if I changed my routine that may affect my ability to eat.

If they were trying to portray this idea of sophistication, then they need to create a more sophisticated pay structure, but then that would be too complicated.

www.confusedyetamused.wordpress.com

Mike Byrnes (Boston, MA) on 01 Aug 2010 at 11:20 pm

Practice the brand is so true.

Here are ten branding best tips ...
http://byrnesconsulting.com/2010/03/23/ten-branding-best-practices/

Mike Byrnes, President

Byrnes Consulting, LLC

http://byrnesconsulting.com/

http://twitter.com/ByrnesConsultin

mcmaddox (Los Angeles) on 29 Jul 2010 at 12:59 pm

Sounds like they didn't complete a brand alignment to go along with their brand strategy. An "indoctrination campaign" isn't he same thing as taking an in-depth look at a company's process to understand all of the touch points and people that have to "live the brand." In my opinion, this is where branding falls apart: in the cubicles, at the counter, and on the show floor. If new brand values aren't tied to the incentive structure and the actual business process, it's a waste of money. I wish more people in the C-suite understood this.

John Cavanaugh (Charlotte, NC) on 29 Jul 2010 at 11:58 am

"Be happy, damn it!" is tough to pull off. And as part of a branding effort, it's doomed to horrible, explosive failure. In this case, you would not want to brand this kind of culture. You'd want to change it, fundamentally.

Branding is never a marketing tool. It is an essence. It's what you are, like it or not. If your brand is strong, you can extend that to your marketing and share it. But if you try to use your brand as THE tool, you'll most likely fail.

douglas1212 (Colorado) on 29 Jul 2010 at 11:38 am

I agree. If you're only "Branding" to look good and not be good it's a waste of time and money.

It's like putting a Vera Wang dress on a pig and trying to pass it off as a fashion model.

-DJM

Display Name: 
Location: 
E-Mail Address: 
Comments: 
 
Enter numbers Why? 

James Brandt is the Program Director for Advision Media, a Digital Signage company, and owner of Brandt Media, a consulting company for film and television producers, advertisers, and media content production.

 

Scoutmob Now in NYC and SF
Advertise on TalentZoo.com

Return to Top